I am really sorry that we won't get to see the Ivory Coast play in the next round. Even without Drogba, they offered up some impressive soccer against Serbia and Montenegro. Anyone watching the second half realized that it wasn't a question of if Ivory Coast would score, but a question of how many. It turned out to be just enough. Serbia and Montenegro showed some great finishing skills, and being a man down proved insurmountable for them (though Stankovic's missed header must have tormented their fans). It was refreshing to see Drogba join his teammates for their post-goal celebrations. There was a certain release each time they scored, and a huge sigh of relief when they netted their third goal. This team would have almost certainly advanced to the knockout phase if it had been drawn into another group. This is the last time that Serbia and Montenegro play as a unified team. Given that there were only two players on this team from Montenegro, it may be a sign that we may not hear much from them in soccer circles. Somehow, I don't think this was on their mind when they voted for independence.
Sometimes, great teams neutralize each other when they play, but Argentina and the Netherlands may have been neutralized even before they stepped onto the pitch. Both teams rested players. I would not be surprised if the possession was even, but the Argentinians made the most of their possession, mainly because of Messi and Tevez who had a chance to showcase their skills. Tevez, in particular, did his best impression of the Energizer Bunny. Riquelme did his part, offering several opportunities for others to find the net. Even then, he seemed about fifteen degrees off his best game. There were many, many moments of individual flair and skill, and a few sequences of surgical passing. But these moments only reminded everyone of what these teams are capable of doing. Some might assume that the Netherlands wasn't too picky between facing Portugal or Mexico, but I think this game just shows that both Argentina and the Netherlands are confident they can play with any team. It wouldn't be a shock if these two teams met again--with much higher stakes.
Showing posts with label ivory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ivory. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
Good God, ESPN!!!
What a ridiculous moment during the Ivory Coast v. Serbia and Montenegro match. First, in my book, when a player is that deliberate with a handball in the box, it should be a red card. Second, why did the referee make Ivory Coast retake the penalty kick? Did the "encroachment" really impact the kick, especially if it was a Serbia and Montenegro player who was responsible?
But leave it to ESPN to make this absurd moment even more ridiculous. Just as they are broadcasting the replay, perhaps offering an insight into the ref's decision, ESPN SHOWED ONE OF THE LARGE, STUPID GRAPHICS THAT COVERS UP THE SCREEN!!!
Nice job, guys. I'm so glad you reminded us of the halftime show at that particular moment.
But leave it to ESPN to make this absurd moment even more ridiculous. Just as they are broadcasting the replay, perhaps offering an insight into the ref's decision, ESPN SHOWED ONE OF THE LARGE, STUPID GRAPHICS THAT COVERS UP THE SCREEN!!!
Nice job, guys. I'm so glad you reminded us of the halftime show at that particular moment.
Sunday, June 18, 2006
Days Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten
Before The World Cup began, I had imagined that Ivory Coast might have been the sleeper or dark horse team. Being placed in the group of death has been hard on them (though, it seems, even harder on Serbia and Montenegro). Having watched Ecuador play twice, I have to say that I believe they are the most promising, surprise team so far. It was so refreshing to see their defenders neutralize Costa Rica's strikers by actually running with them, toward the goal. They didn't rely (exclusively) on the offside trap, having defenders run away from the goal with their hands up in the air. If they tie or beat Germany in the final game of the first round, they win the group.
As for who they might meet in the second round, England still continues to underwhelm. On one level, it was great to see Wayne Rooney in action. The World Cup features the best players in the world, and he certainly fits the bill. But on another level, why did England need his (and Lennon's) boost? Peter Crouch had to resort to hair pulling for the first goal. They just don't seem to be rising to the occasion, and it's worth nothing they haven't beaten Sweden since 1968. If England beats Sweden, and Trinidad and Tobago beats Paraguay, we have to look at tie breakers. As much as I've enjoyed seeing T&T's spirit, I don't see this happening. BTW, major respect to John Terry for that goal line clearance.
Argentina 6, Serbia and Montenegro 0. Argentina has managed this scoreline before in The World Cup in 1978 by beating Peru 6-0, which helped them advance on goal differential over Brazil. However, that match remains controversial to this day. Soccer being soccer, I can even recall articles at the time speculating that Argentina had threatened military action against, or even offered nuclear technology, to Peru (conspiracy theories cut both ways). On this occasion, there's no controversy--just admiration for Argentina's fantastic play. Let's hope both the Netherlands and Argentina continue playing great soccer when they meet in the final game of the first round.
In the "other confederation" arena, it seems that the African confederation is reasserting itself. Ivory Coast played well in a losing effort, Angola tied Mexico, and Ghana's strikers and keeper found their stride against the Czech Republic. From Asia, Iran lost to Portugal, but Japan managed a tie against Croatia, and South Korea came back to tie France. From the CONCACAF realm, there's the US-Italy game.
Let's hope that we witnessed the worst refereeing of the tournament. That ref was hopeless. It takes a lot of courage to hand out a red card to a soccer power like Italy. De Rossi deserved the red card, but many refs would have given him a yellow card and a stern warning. But he almost certainly used Mastroeni for a make-up call. I also don't think he realized that Eddie Pope already had a yellow card. In the end, the US has to be pleased with being alive, though beating Ghana is no easy task. Onyewu seemed to settle into his role, but Eddie Pope still looked lost. The image of him holding up his hand, standing still, during Italy's first goal was rather pathetic. Of course, I'm not sure who's going to play in the back line now that he's suspended.
Both the US-Italy and South Korea-France match left me wondering about European soccer entitlement. What do I mean? De Rossi was clearly upset that his teammate, Zaccardo, scored an own goal (and what a bizarre strike of the ball). Maybe he should have had his words with him. Instead, he decided to elbow Brian McBride. When South Korea scored its goal, William Gallas (who should attend the John Terry school for goal line clearing) was clearly upset. Shortly after the goal, he grabbed (an offside) South Korean player and threw him to the pitch. So, what I wonder about is whether certain Italian or French players would behave this way if they were playing each other (or another of the soccer "powers")? How much of their frustration arose from an expectation, even entitlement, that they were the better team and therefore "deserved" to win.
Regardless of whether I'm just idly (or even unfairly) speculating, it was a very sad sight to see Zidane leave the field, throwing something off to the side. Given his second yellow card, he won't play in France's next game. If teams in their group play better than France, then they decide to advance. But I have to confess that I hope this isn't the last image of Zidane from The World Cup.
As for Brazil, everyone seems to think they're still going at 50%. All I have to say is that Brazil can put anyone into the game, even a guy named Fred, and he will find a way to score :-)
As for who they might meet in the second round, England still continues to underwhelm. On one level, it was great to see Wayne Rooney in action. The World Cup features the best players in the world, and he certainly fits the bill. But on another level, why did England need his (and Lennon's) boost? Peter Crouch had to resort to hair pulling for the first goal. They just don't seem to be rising to the occasion, and it's worth nothing they haven't beaten Sweden since 1968. If England beats Sweden, and Trinidad and Tobago beats Paraguay, we have to look at tie breakers. As much as I've enjoyed seeing T&T's spirit, I don't see this happening. BTW, major respect to John Terry for that goal line clearance.
Argentina 6, Serbia and Montenegro 0. Argentina has managed this scoreline before in The World Cup in 1978 by beating Peru 6-0, which helped them advance on goal differential over Brazil. However, that match remains controversial to this day. Soccer being soccer, I can even recall articles at the time speculating that Argentina had threatened military action against, or even offered nuclear technology, to Peru (conspiracy theories cut both ways). On this occasion, there's no controversy--just admiration for Argentina's fantastic play. Let's hope both the Netherlands and Argentina continue playing great soccer when they meet in the final game of the first round.
In the "other confederation" arena, it seems that the African confederation is reasserting itself. Ivory Coast played well in a losing effort, Angola tied Mexico, and Ghana's strikers and keeper found their stride against the Czech Republic. From Asia, Iran lost to Portugal, but Japan managed a tie against Croatia, and South Korea came back to tie France. From the CONCACAF realm, there's the US-Italy game.
Let's hope that we witnessed the worst refereeing of the tournament. That ref was hopeless. It takes a lot of courage to hand out a red card to a soccer power like Italy. De Rossi deserved the red card, but many refs would have given him a yellow card and a stern warning. But he almost certainly used Mastroeni for a make-up call. I also don't think he realized that Eddie Pope already had a yellow card. In the end, the US has to be pleased with being alive, though beating Ghana is no easy task. Onyewu seemed to settle into his role, but Eddie Pope still looked lost. The image of him holding up his hand, standing still, during Italy's first goal was rather pathetic. Of course, I'm not sure who's going to play in the back line now that he's suspended.
Both the US-Italy and South Korea-France match left me wondering about European soccer entitlement. What do I mean? De Rossi was clearly upset that his teammate, Zaccardo, scored an own goal (and what a bizarre strike of the ball). Maybe he should have had his words with him. Instead, he decided to elbow Brian McBride. When South Korea scored its goal, William Gallas (who should attend the John Terry school for goal line clearing) was clearly upset. Shortly after the goal, he grabbed (an offside) South Korean player and threw him to the pitch. So, what I wonder about is whether certain Italian or French players would behave this way if they were playing each other (or another of the soccer "powers")? How much of their frustration arose from an expectation, even entitlement, that they were the better team and therefore "deserved" to win.
Regardless of whether I'm just idly (or even unfairly) speculating, it was a very sad sight to see Zidane leave the field, throwing something off to the side. Given his second yellow card, he won't play in France's next game. If teams in their group play better than France, then they decide to advance. But I have to confess that I hope this isn't the last image of Zidane from The World Cup.
As for Brazil, everyone seems to think they're still going at 50%. All I have to say is that Brazil can put anyone into the game, even a guy named Fred, and he will find a way to score :-)
Saturday, June 10, 2006
Day Two
The English are the Brazilians of Europe. What's that, you say? What about Spain (maybe not in The World Cup), the French, the Netherlands, or the Czech Republic. The Netherlands v. Czech Republic game in Euro2004 was a clinic on beautiful soccer. Well, the English have their share of elegant play. But what I'm really referring to is the fan and press reaction to the English team. It seems that unless they play elegantly and win The World Cup, their fans will be disappointed.
There was 1966. Geoff Hurst, the hat trick, the goal that did or did not cross the line. What English fans may not be willing to acknowledge is that if you take away the 1966 World Cup, England's World Cup record is equalled, even surpassed by other countries who have yet to win the Cup. You can't minimize the importance of winning the Cup; only seven nations have managed it. But, for a moment, imagine that Pele hadn't been hacked out of the 1966 tournament...The English team in 1986 and 1990 was one of their best. If Maradona hadn't inspired the Argentinians in 1986 and had a hand in their victory over England (sorry, I couldn't resist), England would have made the semi-finals. 1990 was the only other occasion when England made it to the semis or finals. This team featured many great players, but I always thought that Gary Lineker didn't get enough recognition.
Beyond these tournaments, the English have not particularly excelled in The World Cup. Yet, each time when The World Cup comes around, we hear about how the English are one of the tournament favorites (at least in the US). In 2006, they certainly have a great midfield and potent strikers (especially if Rooney is ready to play). But they also have a bad habit of playing down to their opponents. Perhaps it is part of Sven Goran Ericsson's strategy to slow down, conserve energy, and contain the game. But an own goal off a Beckham free kick hardly represents a powerful offensive display. And Paraguay had a few chances. If only one of them bounced the right way (or wrong way depending on your perspective), it would have been a disaster for England. Rooney not only provides considerable talent, but he also brings a certain passion and fire to the team. He doesn't want to win 1-0. He wants to score goals. Perhaps more than anything, he'll bring intensity, throughout the entire game, that might elevate England to the top. Assuming he's fit.
Of course, the result from the second game in Group B must have come as welcome news to England, and Trinidad and Tobago, given 2000-1 odds of winning the Cup. Even their manager guaranteed that they would not win The World Cup. Sweden has world class players and loads of experience. Trinidad and Tobago is the smallest nation to qualify for The World Cup. Then their first choice goalkeeper injures himself during the warm-ups (for the first thirteen minutes, the commentators kept referring to Kelvin Jack, instead of Shaka Hislop). During the second half, they are reduced to ten men. Surely, Sweden would win easily. This, my friends, is why they play the game.
Thirty-four year old Dwight Yorke came out of retirement to join Trinidad and Tobago. And I'm sure they are glad he did so. Shaka Hislop is thirty-seven years old; he had the energy of a twenty-year old. Brent Sacho, plays for a third division English club, but he played like a premier Italian defender. They, along with their teammates, stood very tall on this day. If you've ever played sports, at any level, you might know those rare convergences of being "in the zone" or rising above your natural talents. To watch an entire team, even one man down, an entire nation ride this wave of energy, inspiration, even magic, is really something. I'll be the first to admit that many 0-0 soccer games are dour, dull affairs. But this game showed that a 0-0 game can feature plenty of entertainment and suspense.
In 2002, when Belarus defeated Sweden in Olympic ice hockey, Swedish newspapers declared it the greatest upset in Swedish sports history. If Trinidad and Tobago had somehow beaten Sweden (and they hit the crossbar at one point!), I suspect this one would have been even bigger. I know, I know, hockey is king in Sweden, but still...
For 90 minutes, Trinidad and Tobago became everyone's favorite soccer team--except for the Swedes, of course. But they deserve a great deal of credit for how they handled this game. Ljungberg showed frustration in the final minutes, but who could blame him. At the end of the game, the Swedes shook hands, swapped jerseys and showed their respect. They knew they were on the short end of this moment, but they seemed to acknowledge (albeit begrudgingly) their role in creating World Cup lore.
After Belarus defeated Sweden in Olympic hockey, they came back down to reality. Even the Belarus goalie who seemed impenetrable against Sweden, looked very average in the next game. Jon Davidson, one of the hockey commentators, said that he hoped everyone remembered Belarus' goalie as he was during the game with Sweden. Shaka Hislop may come back down to earth as well but, on this day, he was king.
During ESPN's post-game show, Eric Wynalda said that Argentina was the best team we've seen so far. I agree. Argentina displayed creativity on offense, and enough discipline on defense to beat a talented Ivory Coast team. They "choked" the game without turning it into a sloppy, boring affair. I have to admit that I wondered about how Riquelme's deliberate style would fit within the Argentinian scheme. So I have to admit that I was very wrong. He had a role in both goals, and his pass to Saviola for the second goal was pure genius. Saviola's deft touch must have made Argentinian fans feel better about the striking duo with Crespo.
Ivory Coast had its moments, and if they had scored first, the game would have been very different indeed. The defender who was marking Crespo simply froze on the first goal. They also didn't manage to find the "optimal" play with the referee, who I believe missed several calls. Drogba was pushed in the box, but perhaps his (undeserved?) reputation as a diver cost him. Argentina kept Droga off balance throughout the game--literally. While the ref should have kept a better handle on this, the Argentinians did manage to take full advantage without crossing the line (or was that the first "goal" of the game that I'm referring to)? Ivory Coast probably could have pushed, nudged, even fouled Riquelme more than they did. The Netherlands and Serbia and Montenegro (I think it's still OK to refer to them in this manner) will almost certainly close him down more quickly. And they should. He wears no. 10, and while he's not Maradona, he certainly has exceptional vision and skills.
Drogba showed why he can be so dangerous with their goal, after the Ivory Coast seemed to wake up with about twenty-five minutes left in the game. If they can tighten up the defense and play with intensity throughout the match, I still think they can advance to the next round. In groups of death, it's possible for each team to end with four points in the round robin beating that each team will face. Goal differential and goals scored will be important.
Perhaps the novelty and pressure of being in The World Cup for the first time was too much for the Ivory Coast. Maybe they could have watched the Trinidad and Tobago game for inspiration :-)
There was 1966. Geoff Hurst, the hat trick, the goal that did or did not cross the line. What English fans may not be willing to acknowledge is that if you take away the 1966 World Cup, England's World Cup record is equalled, even surpassed by other countries who have yet to win the Cup. You can't minimize the importance of winning the Cup; only seven nations have managed it. But, for a moment, imagine that Pele hadn't been hacked out of the 1966 tournament...The English team in 1986 and 1990 was one of their best. If Maradona hadn't inspired the Argentinians in 1986 and had a hand in their victory over England (sorry, I couldn't resist), England would have made the semi-finals. 1990 was the only other occasion when England made it to the semis or finals. This team featured many great players, but I always thought that Gary Lineker didn't get enough recognition.
Beyond these tournaments, the English have not particularly excelled in The World Cup. Yet, each time when The World Cup comes around, we hear about how the English are one of the tournament favorites (at least in the US). In 2006, they certainly have a great midfield and potent strikers (especially if Rooney is ready to play). But they also have a bad habit of playing down to their opponents. Perhaps it is part of Sven Goran Ericsson's strategy to slow down, conserve energy, and contain the game. But an own goal off a Beckham free kick hardly represents a powerful offensive display. And Paraguay had a few chances. If only one of them bounced the right way (or wrong way depending on your perspective), it would have been a disaster for England. Rooney not only provides considerable talent, but he also brings a certain passion and fire to the team. He doesn't want to win 1-0. He wants to score goals. Perhaps more than anything, he'll bring intensity, throughout the entire game, that might elevate England to the top. Assuming he's fit.
Of course, the result from the second game in Group B must have come as welcome news to England, and Trinidad and Tobago, given 2000-1 odds of winning the Cup. Even their manager guaranteed that they would not win The World Cup. Sweden has world class players and loads of experience. Trinidad and Tobago is the smallest nation to qualify for The World Cup. Then their first choice goalkeeper injures himself during the warm-ups (for the first thirteen minutes, the commentators kept referring to Kelvin Jack, instead of Shaka Hislop). During the second half, they are reduced to ten men. Surely, Sweden would win easily. This, my friends, is why they play the game.
Thirty-four year old Dwight Yorke came out of retirement to join Trinidad and Tobago. And I'm sure they are glad he did so. Shaka Hislop is thirty-seven years old; he had the energy of a twenty-year old. Brent Sacho, plays for a third division English club, but he played like a premier Italian defender. They, along with their teammates, stood very tall on this day. If you've ever played sports, at any level, you might know those rare convergences of being "in the zone" or rising above your natural talents. To watch an entire team, even one man down, an entire nation ride this wave of energy, inspiration, even magic, is really something. I'll be the first to admit that many 0-0 soccer games are dour, dull affairs. But this game showed that a 0-0 game can feature plenty of entertainment and suspense.
In 2002, when Belarus defeated Sweden in Olympic ice hockey, Swedish newspapers declared it the greatest upset in Swedish sports history. If Trinidad and Tobago had somehow beaten Sweden (and they hit the crossbar at one point!), I suspect this one would have been even bigger. I know, I know, hockey is king in Sweden, but still...
For 90 minutes, Trinidad and Tobago became everyone's favorite soccer team--except for the Swedes, of course. But they deserve a great deal of credit for how they handled this game. Ljungberg showed frustration in the final minutes, but who could blame him. At the end of the game, the Swedes shook hands, swapped jerseys and showed their respect. They knew they were on the short end of this moment, but they seemed to acknowledge (albeit begrudgingly) their role in creating World Cup lore.
After Belarus defeated Sweden in Olympic hockey, they came back down to reality. Even the Belarus goalie who seemed impenetrable against Sweden, looked very average in the next game. Jon Davidson, one of the hockey commentators, said that he hoped everyone remembered Belarus' goalie as he was during the game with Sweden. Shaka Hislop may come back down to earth as well but, on this day, he was king.
During ESPN's post-game show, Eric Wynalda said that Argentina was the best team we've seen so far. I agree. Argentina displayed creativity on offense, and enough discipline on defense to beat a talented Ivory Coast team. They "choked" the game without turning it into a sloppy, boring affair. I have to admit that I wondered about how Riquelme's deliberate style would fit within the Argentinian scheme. So I have to admit that I was very wrong. He had a role in both goals, and his pass to Saviola for the second goal was pure genius. Saviola's deft touch must have made Argentinian fans feel better about the striking duo with Crespo.
Ivory Coast had its moments, and if they had scored first, the game would have been very different indeed. The defender who was marking Crespo simply froze on the first goal. They also didn't manage to find the "optimal" play with the referee, who I believe missed several calls. Drogba was pushed in the box, but perhaps his (undeserved?) reputation as a diver cost him. Argentina kept Droga off balance throughout the game--literally. While the ref should have kept a better handle on this, the Argentinians did manage to take full advantage without crossing the line (or was that the first "goal" of the game that I'm referring to)? Ivory Coast probably could have pushed, nudged, even fouled Riquelme more than they did. The Netherlands and Serbia and Montenegro (I think it's still OK to refer to them in this manner) will almost certainly close him down more quickly. And they should. He wears no. 10, and while he's not Maradona, he certainly has exceptional vision and skills.
Drogba showed why he can be so dangerous with their goal, after the Ivory Coast seemed to wake up with about twenty-five minutes left in the game. If they can tighten up the defense and play with intensity throughout the match, I still think they can advance to the next round. In groups of death, it's possible for each team to end with four points in the round robin beating that each team will face. Goal differential and goals scored will be important.
Perhaps the novelty and pressure of being in The World Cup for the first time was too much for the Ivory Coast. Maybe they could have watched the Trinidad and Tobago game for inspiration :-)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
